Categories
Arts & Culture

Defining Philippine style

 

 

By ELIZABETH LOLARGA

“FUSION” seems to be the best word to describe the look of Filipino buildings and home interiors.

Filipino Style, a 1997 de luxe book put out by the Department of Tourism in time for the country’s national centennial in ’98 and preceding the current soft-cover Philippine Style: Design and Architecture (Anvil Publishing Inc.), used that word long before it became the vogue adjective for food that takes in a variety of cultural influences.

“Three hundred years in the convent, 50 in Hollywood and a brief interlude with the Japanese”–that was how eminent writer Carmen Guerrero Nakpil described  the country’s colonial history and its three former masters (Spain, the US and Japan). The last didn’t quite seep in, except maybe in the sleek lines of modern architecture.

Today, hard-earned dollars from overseas Filipino workers have made possible the rise of a hodge-podge of architecture flecking the countryside with houses derivative of Mediterranean villas or Mexican landlords’ haciendas and assorted misadvised kitsch coming from new money. There seems to be no acknowledgment of the wisdom inherent in the humble bahay kubo (native hut) or the gentry’s bahay na bato (house of stone), especially their factoring in of climate (harsh sun, torrential rains) and site.

Architect Dominic Galicia points out in the introduction to Philippine Style that the kubo has a “geometric simplicity: a pyramidal roof hovering like a parasol over a bamboo box of stilts. Rain slid off the steeply pitched cogon roof, while fresh air, flowing in through the slatted floor and the wide windows, cooled the interior before exiting through the permeable roof thatch.” Even the Spanish-influenced bahay na bato considered the kubo an elegant and “simple solution to climate control.”

Today’s discerning architect refers to these structures from the past to build buildings and houses. The book is full of examples of how parts of old houses that are increasingly being demolished to make way for townhouses and multi-purpose condominiums (combining malls with floors of living and office spaces) can still be saved, reclaimed and recycled. Besides, “retro” and “shabby chic” are quite in with new home owners who are enlightened enough by the high-profile environmental cause to nod respectfully towards Nature in building their houses.

Philippine Style, with contributed articles by Galicia, Ateneo Prof. Rene Javellana, Elizabeth V. Reyes, Joan Pasagui and Luca Tettoni, is both a scholarly and handy guide. It acknowledges the works of great Filipino architects (Juan Arellano, Andres Luna de San Pedro, Fernando Ocampo, Juan Nakpil, Pablo Antonio, Leandro Locsin, Gabriel Formoso, the brothers Mañosa).

It gives generous visual space to the inroads made by such innovative designers and aesthetes like Kenneth Cobonpue, Budji Layug, Milo Naval, Ino Manalo, Tina Periquet, Anna Sy, Benji Reyes who have drawn from Filipino materials and idioms in design in their works or cultural projects.

Cobonpue is a fine example of one who blends modern sensibility with Filipino fibers (rattan, buri, abaca, bamboo), helping him attain his stature as a “celebrity designer” for the likes of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

Architect Rosario “Ning” Encarnacion Tan has almost waged a heroic one-woman battle in behalf of “bamboo’s possibilities.” She is quoted as saying, “Bamboo was seen as a poor man’s material, not strong and sturdy. Actually, bamboo is the ideal generic medium to express what is vernacular, authentic, sustainable, culture, reflective, and spiritual.”

Her bamboo houses are unique for they are “portable and dismantleable,” i.e., they can be assembled in one space and moved to another, just like the bahay kubo of old portrayed in paintings as a form of bayanihan, with the town’s menfolk carrying the hut on poles on their shoulders.

Two pavilions of a contemporary home with a lake view

At a time when the progressive green movement is calling for a moratorium on large-scale logging to maintain the country’s forest cover, the book includes towards the end a “Glossary of Natural Materials.” The lay reader can get acquainted with the many uses, including medicinal ones, of precious Philippine hardwoods (tindalo, lanite, dao) and learn to appreciate the beauty as well as usefulness of the capiz, cogon grass, piña, nipa, rattan, adobe.

Philippine Style also has a section devoted to designers’ portfolios that again show how a contemporary look can be achieved with traditional materials. A Yoda easy chair is made of natural rattan vines woven onto a steel frame. A Lulu easy chair has strands of abaca rope wrapped over a light steel frame.

As for accessorizing the home, the book is big on patronizing our very own, the stoneware makers among them. Highlighted are the “whimsical stoneware” of Jon and Tessy Pettyjohn, Lanelle Abueva Fernando, Ugu Bigyan, the last earning a reputation for shaping pottery from forms drawn from nature and manmade creations like crochet lace. Their works have, in a manner of speaking, fired up the ceramic industry.