Skip to content
post thumbnail

FACT CHECK: Judges ruling that ICC has no jurisdiction NEEDS CONTEXT

WHAT WAS CLAIMED

ICC judges Marc Perin de Brichambaut and Gocha Lordkipanidze issued a decision to stop the arrest of former president Rodrigo Duterte.

OUR VERDICT

Needs Context:

The dissenting opinion was issued on July 18, 2023 regarding the ICC Appeals Court’s decision to resume the investigation into Duterte’s war on drugs.

By VERA Files

Mar 14, 2025

2-minute read
ifcn badgemeta badge

Share This Article

:

A Facebook (FB) post reported about a supposed dissenting opinion of International Criminal Court (ICC) judges on the Philippines’ war on drugs case at The Hague. This needs context. The dissenting opinion was made in July 2023 when the the Appeals Court on an affirmative vote of 3-2 decided to resume ICC investigation..

A reader sent a request to VERA Files’ Messenger Misinformation Tipline to verify a March 12 FB post. The post caption read:

“Two ICC Judges argued that the Duterte Trial is OUT of their jurisdiction. In an earlier decision, ICC Judges Brichambaut (Chief Judge) and Lordkipanidze argued that the ICC doesn’t have jurisdiction over the “Philippine Situation”, the case regarding the War on Drugs pending before ICC, because the Philippines is no longer a State Party under the Rome Statue. In the jurisdictional decision, the vote was close 3 in favor, 2 against including the Chief Judge.”

The post contained a link to the dissenting opinion issued by ICC judges Marc Perin de Brichambaut and Gocha Lordkipanidze. It also had a collage containing images of the two judges and a line from the opinion encircled in red, which read:

“For the foregoing reasons, we consider that the Pre-Trial Chamber erred in law in concluding that the Court had jurisdiction over the Philippines Situation despite the Philippines’ withdrawal from the Rome Statute. As a result, we would have granted the Philippines first ground of appeal and found that the Court cannot exercise jurisdiction in the Philippines Situation. Consequently, we would have found the remaining grounds of appeal moot. We would also have directed the Pre-Trial Chamber to withdraw its authorisation for the Prosecutor’s investigation and discontinue all proceedings in the situation.”

Commenters under the post had the impression that the decision was issued to stop this week’s arrest of former president Rodrigo Duterte over the ICC investigation into his administration’s war on drugs.

The dissenting opinion by International Criminal Court judges Marc Perin de Brichambaut and Gocha Lordkipanidze on the Court’s jurisdiction in the Philippines was issued back in July 18, 2023, not recently.

Appeals Court judges Brichambaut and Lordkipanidze issued their dissenting opinion on the decision to resume the ICC investigation into Duterte’s war on drugs, which the Philippine government appealed to stop in 2023.

The two judges argued that the ICC no longer had jurisdiction over the country due to the Philippines’ withdrawal as signatory from the Rome Statute (not Statue as indicated in the post caption) effective since March 17, 2019.

However, the investigation continued on July 18, 2023 following an affirmative vote of 3-2 at the Appeals Court.

The deceptive post circulated amid Duterte’s arrest on March 11 by the International Criminal Police Organization. The former president is now detained at an ICC facility in The Netherlands while awaiting trial.

The post was uploaded by DU30 MEDIA Network (created June 9, 2016) and has garnered 5,400 reactions, 984 comments and 10,000 shares.

Get VERAfied

Receive fresh perspectives and explainers in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.