President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was given a standing ovation (one of the three) when he reiterated his unyielding stand on the country’s ownership of the West Philippine Sea in his third State of the Nation Address on July 22.
But even as he tried to rally the people behind a common adversary, which is China, he talked of finding “ways to de-escalate tensions in contested areas,“ underscoring “proper diplomatic channels and mechanisms under the rules-based international order” in settling disputes.
Hours before the president made that declaration, Filipino and Chinese diplomats simultaneously announced the arrangement they agreed on for the rotation and resupply (RORE) to the Philippine Marines stationed at BRP Sierra Made on Ayungin Shoal (international name: Second Thomas Shoal and Chinese name: Ren’ai Jiao).
The three-paragraph statement of the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said in part, “The Philippines and the People’s Republic of China have reached an understanding on the provisional arrangement for the resupply of daily necessities and rotation missions to the BRP Sierra Madre in Ayungin Shoal.”
China’s five-paragraph announcement, in a question-and-answer form, gave more information. It insisted on China’s sovereignty over Ren’ai Jiao and reiterated its demand for the BRP Sierra Madre to be removed from Ayungin Shoal.
These are the two most significant points:
“Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities to the personnel living on the warship, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. China will monitor the entire resupply process.
“Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations to uphold China’s sovereignty and the sanctity of the DOC.”
Immediately, DFA refuted China’s statement, “The spokesperson’s statement (therefore) regarding prior notification and on-site confirmation is inaccurate. “
It added that, “The agreement was concluded with the clear understanding by both sides that it will not prejudice our respective national positions.”
The test of this breakthrough agreement is in its implementation. Let’s see.
