(UPDATED) The claim of Edsel Maurice Salvana, an infectious diseases doctor, that there is “science” behind the use of face shields as a defense against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), lacks context.
In a Facebook post on Jan. 4, Salvana, director of the Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology at the University of the Philippines Manila-National Institutes of Health (UP Manila-NIH) and adviser of the Philippine government on its response against COVID-19, shared a supposed conversation with a social media troll:
“Troll: There is NO SCIENCE behind the use of face shields!
Me: Meron (there is)! [Shows PSMID guidelines and summary of evidence.]
Source: Edsel Salvana official Facebook account, New troll tactic!, Jan. 4, 2022 (11:17 a.m.)
Earlier that day, Salvana shared on Facebook the latest guidelines of the Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (PSMID) on the use of face shields, saying that “many people are misreading the Living CPG (Clinical Practice Guidelines) Guidelines (sic) according to their biases.”
While the Living CPG task force, which is mainly composed of groups of medical specialists like PSMID, did recommend the use of face shields on certain conditions, it noted in the “evidence summary” the “very low certainty of evidence” to prove their effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 infection.
In a 14-page evidence summary dated Nov. 5, 2021, the task force led by the Institute of Clinical Epidemiology of the UP Manila-NIH in cooperation with PSMID, cited five studies involving health care workers. The set of recommendations was produced with funding from the Department of Health (DOH), and is primarily intended to guide health care providers. The summary stated the “overall certainty of evidence was very low as the studies were non-randomized, unadjusted for confounders and with high risk of bias as well as indirectness.”
“Three case-control studies showed a trend toward benefit with the use of face shields but this was inconclusive …Two pre- and post- face shield use surveillance studies showed significant benefit …, respectively,” the task force said in its key findings, noting that four of the studies were conducted in a health care setting and one in a community in India.
In assessing the evidence from the studies, the task force used the four-tier rating system of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group, composed of international health experts working on grading systems for research on health care. GRADE defined “very low certainty of evidence” as “[t]he likelihood that the effect [of the research] will be substantially different (a large enough difference that it might have an effect on a decision) is very high.”
Despite this, the group still strongly recommended the use of face shields on top of face masks to the general public, as well as to medical workers who don’t directly provide care for COVID-19 patients, and in areas with sustained community transmission. It issued a “weak recommendation” on the lifting of the mandatory use of face shields on top of face masks among people in non-health care settings. However, it noted that the recommendations would be updated “as the evidence evolves.”
On the contrary, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC) does not recommend the use of a face shield to the public given an ongoing evaluation of its effectiveness.
The World Health Organization (WHO) says that the effectiveness of face shields “for source control has not yet been adequately studied.” It said face shields may provide only “partial protection”against respiratory droplets.
In late December 2021, President Rodrigo Duterte renewed his advice to the public to use face shields due to the threat posed by the new Omicron variant of COVID-19.
The government used to mandate the wearing of face shields outside residences, but some lawmakers and local officials called for a review of the policy, raising the lack of scientific basis on its effectiveness. (See VERA FILES FACT CHECK: To use or not to use: How the govt’s face shield policy evolve)
Wearing a face shield is now mandatory only in places under alert level 5, and voluntary in areas under alert levels 1, 2 and 3. Local government units and private establishments in places under alert level 4 are given the discretion to decide on the matter.
VERA Files Fact Check subsequently released a statement here.
Have you seen any dubious claims, photos, memes, or online posts that you want us to verify? Fill out this reader request form.
Edsel Salvana official Facebook account, New troll tactic!, Jan. 4, 2022 (11:17 a.m.)
Edsel Salvana official Facebook account, Many people are misreading…, Jan. 4, 2022 (8:25 a.m.)
University of the Philippines National Institutes of Health, Salvana, Edsel Maurice T., Accessed Jan. 13, 2022
Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Inc., Philippine COVID-19 Living Recommendations, Accessed Jan. 11, 2022
Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Inc., METHODS –, Accessed Jan. 13, 2022
Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Inc., PEOPLE, Accessed Jan. 13, 2022
Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Inc., DISCLAIMER, Accessed Jan. 13, 2022
GRADE official website, GRADE Working Group, Accessed Jan. 8, 2022
Philippine Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Inc., Email to VERA Files on the query on “very low certainty of evidence” on face shields, Jan. 13, 2022
United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Your Guide to Masks, Accessed Jan. 8, 2022
World Health Organization, COVID-19 infection prevention and control living guideline: mask use in community settings, 22 December 2021, Dec. 22, 2021 (pdf file)
Official Gazette, RESOLUTION NO. 88 Series of 2020, Dec. 14, 2020
Senate of the Philippines, Press Release – Revilla: Reconsider decision on face shields, June 13, 2021
Senate of the Philippines, On the wearing of face shield, June 15, 2021
Senate of the Philippines, Press Release – PRIB: Transcript of interview of Senate President Vicente C. Sotto III with Ms. Cely Bueno of DWIZ, June 19, 2021
Metropolitan Manila Development Authority, Nov. 8, 2021 Metro Mayors to Recommend to IATF Scrapping of Face Shields Except for Critical Areas, nov. 8, 2021
Rappler.com, Review sought for mandatory wearing of face shields in PH, June 9, 2021
Official Gazette, Guidelines for Nationwide Alert Level System as of 18 Nov 2021, Nov. 18, 2021
Presidential Communications Operations Office, President Duterte nixes face shield use in areas under Alert Level 3 and lower Nov. 16, 2021
(Guided by the code of principles of the International Fact-Checking Network at Poynter, VERA Files tracks the false claims, flip-flops, misleading statements of public officials and figures, and debunks them with factual evidence. Find out more about this initiative and our methodology.)