VERA Files
(UPDATED) Kulang sa konteksto ang pahayag ni Edsel Maurice Salvana, isang infectious diseases doctor, na mayroong “agham” sa likod ng paggamit ng mga face shield bilang depensa laban sa coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The claim of Edsel Maurice Salvana, an infectious diseases doctor, that there is “science” behind the use of face shields as a defense against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), lacks context.
Robredo said no such thing. This post followed her statement in a media briefing where she said: “Sa totoo lang, medyo naasiwa ako na, at this point, issue pa rin sa atin ang face shield. Imbes sana na napagkakagastusan natin ‘yon, idagdag nalang natin sa pondo sa bakuna.” (To be honest, I’m annoyed that the face shield [mandate] is still an issue for us. Instead of buying more, we should increase our funds for the vaccine).
Sa loob ng pitong oras noong Hunyo 21, binago ng Malacañang pahayag nito tungkol sa paggamit ng mga face shield sa loob ng gusali lamang bilang bahagi ng mga health at safety protocol laban sa coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Within seven hours on June 21, Malacañang backtracked on its pronouncement on confining the required use of face shields indoors as part of health and safety protocols against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Mali ang pagkakaugnay ni Manila Mayor Francisco “Isko Moreno” Domagoso sa United States (U.S.) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sa isang pag-aaral na nagpapahiwatig na limitado ang bisa ng mga face shield sa pagsugpo sa pagkalat ng coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Manila Mayor Francisco “Isko Moreno” Domagoso wrongly attributed to the United States (U.S.) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) a study that suggested limited effectiveness of face shields in curbing the transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The TV host says, “I never said this nor created this meme.”